Cheri's profileLaughing GiraffeBlogLists Tools Help

Blog


    March 04

    abstract vs. literal dance

    I had a conversation about dance this morning after a dance class I went to. We were discussing (among other things), whether dance (and art in general) should be abstract or literal. We were discussing this as it pertains to the church, but I suppose it might apply to other situations as well. Someone expressed the opinion (which I don't agree with) that all dance and art should be literal because people don't understand abstract art and it is perhaps selfish to do something that the audience won't understand. Ie. "The message needs to be clear!"

    So, I thought I would blog my musings since this morning's conversation (I did say some stuff in the conversation, but as usual, I come up with better stuff later....)

    First, a lot of time in the Bible, God speaks to people in abstract or "unclear" ways. Most of what Jesus said was very cryptic and left his disciples (those closest to him) scratching their heads. And in the time when God spoke to people through prophets -- that was very "abstract", to say the least! Try reading Ezekiel and you'll see what I mean. In fact, as I think about it, a LOT of the Bible is abstract.

    Second, I think that wanting to be "clear" in what your dance/painting/song is saying is a control issue. People want to control what the audience will understand rather than presenting something and leaving it up to God to speak to someone through that piece of art.

    So, those are my musings on the subject for today. I leave you with two quotes:

    "If you try to please everyone, you'll end up pleasing no one."
    "Ideas are not worth as much as people."

    Comments (1)

    Please wait...
    Sorry, the comment you entered is too long. Please shorten it.
    You didn't enter anything. Please try again.
    Sorry, we can't add your comment right now. Please try again later.
    To add a comment, you need permission from your parent. Ask for permission
    Your parent has turned off comments.
    Sorry, we can't delete your comment right now. Please try again later.
    You've exceeded the maximum number of comments that can be left in one day. Please try again in 24 hours.
    Your account has had the ability to leave comments disabled because our systems indicate that you may be spamming other users. If you believe that your account has been disabled in error please contact Windows Live support.
    Complete the security check below to finish leaving your comment.
    The characters you type in the security check must match the characters in the picture or audio.

    To add a comment, sign in with your Windows Live ID (if you use Hotmail, Messenger, or Xbox LIVE, you have a Windows Live ID). Sign in


    Don't have a Windows Live ID? Sign up

    Jwrote:
    Interesting topic!  I have to say I agree and disagree with some of this.  First off, I can understand what that person may have meant by making it more literal in a church atmosphere... It's so difficult now-a-days to do things and not get taken the wrong way.  Don't get me wrong, I think most "PolCor" deals are stupid.  Am just sayin I can maybe see their point.
     
    I DO agree with your point though in that it should be allowed that a person go to God for the interpretation if they are confused or if it is not obvious.  But I also believe that the church is a representative of God, and that if you cause confusion, this is not a good idea either.  Such a fine line to walk sometimes dontcha think?
     
    One thing I take minor issue with though is the whole "biblical abstract" thingie.  Agreed, Jesus used parables to teach people about different lessons in life.  And granted, some of it sounds a bit difficult to understand.  But if you really look at it, it is quite plain what he was saying and he always followed with, or promised an interpretation afterwards.  I believe the bible states, that if someone is going to prophesy for example in church, that there also MUST be someone there to interpret.  (Sorry can't 'member where that was said)  This is an important aspect in teaching faith I believe and it has always hit close to home with me.  I have been to many churches in the past where everyone was speaking out and such and no one was there to interpret.  God is a God of order, not chaos.  Therefore, his church should represent that.  I am not speaking in extremes here either!  I think that churches shouldn't dictate either... cause then you supress, and a buncha nasties come out of that.  The balance is key, and that is why church leaders have such an important job-they need to find this meeting ground where people can feel free to come to God by CHOICE, yet understand what they are doing and why.  My overall opinion would be that He DOES speak plainly to those who are willing to listen.  I think it's more of a choice whether or not people WISH to make things more complicated.  It's sort of like life in general; the more complicated you make it, the harder it is to live.  When one slows down, and simplifies their life, things start to make sense.  I believe the same goes for God and the bible.  Yes, there are things that are difficult to understand, and things written in prophetic terms.  Some of these things I am sure not everyone is meant to understand at first glance.  But no where in the bible does God say it's all easy... LOL  So I guess the path to him, is full of important details like any other thing we do in life.  Just depends on your approach I suppose. (-;
     
    I think that God is only as abstract as you wanna make him.  Sometimes he allows us to be challenged, and sometimes, he will allow us to see an answer easily.  Guess it depends how closely one communes with him and how open one is to listening to what he's gotta say!
     
    Cool subject to ponder regardless!  Thanks for sharin girl!  xoxoxo
    Mar. 7

    Trackbacks

    The trackback URL for this entry is:
    http://laughinggiraffe.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!824CB5DBBBCE2D10!291.trak
    Weblogs that reference this entry
    • None