| Cheri's profileLaughing GiraffeBlogLists | Help |
|
March 04 abstract vs. literal danceI had a conversation about dance this morning after a dance class I
went to. We were discussing (among other things), whether dance (and
art in general) should be abstract or literal. We were discussing this
as it pertains to the church, but I suppose it might apply to other
situations as well. Someone expressed the opinion (which I don't agree
with) that all dance and art should be literal because people don't
understand abstract art and it is perhaps selfish to do something that
the
audience won't understand. Ie. "The message needs to be clear!" So, I thought I would blog my musings since this morning's conversation (I did say some stuff in the conversation, but as usual, I come up with better stuff later....) First, a lot of time in the Bible, God speaks to people in abstract or "unclear" ways. Most of what Jesus said was very cryptic and left his disciples (those closest to him) scratching their heads. And in the time when God spoke to people through prophets -- that was very "abstract", to say the least! Try reading Ezekiel and you'll see what I mean. In fact, as I think about it, a LOT of the Bible is abstract. Second, I think that wanting to be "clear" in what your dance/painting/song is saying is a control issue. People want to control what the audience will understand rather than presenting something and leaving it up to God to speak to someone through that piece of art. So, those are my musings on the subject for today. I leave you with two quotes: "If you try to please everyone, you'll end up pleasing no one." "Ideas are not worth as much as people." Comments (1)
TrackbacksThe trackback URL for this entry is: http://laughinggiraffe.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!824CB5DBBBCE2D10!291.trak Weblogs that reference this entry
|
|
|